<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rssdatehelper="urn:rssdatehelper"><channel><title>Marti @the summmit</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com</link><pubDate></pubDate><generator>umbraco</generator><description>Need SEO rich blog description</description><language>en</language><item><title>Why Projects Fail</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/6/21/why-projects-fail</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:59:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/6/21/why-projects-fail</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>I liked this article by Safinaaz Rawji on why projects fail. We
have a key speaker, David Maxfield, who no doubt will have much to
say about this list:</p>

<p>As managers, we have experienced project failure in some shape
or form. It can come from working on a project you
<strong>know</strong> should have not have passed through the
governance body and now <strong>you</strong> have <strong>no
choice</strong> but to lead, or it can be a project that has
incredible<br />
 potential but no one is on board.</p>

<p>Below is a list of common signs/causes of project failure…</p>

<ol>
<li>Project Manager is worried about losing their job or upsetting
the leadership team.</li>

<li>Client expectations are not realistic and cannot be met.</li>

<li>Client/leadership keeps changing the project design.</li>

<li>Wrong resources assigned to the project/tasks.</li>

<li>Poor or lack of Communication with the client, stakeholders,
etc.</li>

<li>Lack of involvement from stakeholders.</li>

<li>Poor planning - planning is to rigid and doesn't give space to
handle any issues/risks. Planning is solely done by project
managers.</li>

<li>Absence of Risk Management</li>

<li>Management works to make senior management/director/VP's
happy.</li>

<li>Project is based on CXO's dream with no clear vision or
business value.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Nurture a Project Culture</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/6/14/nurture-a-project-culture</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:50:16 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/6/14/nurture-a-project-culture</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>Just read a great article from Mike Gordon of the MIT Sloan
Management Review. After surveying more than 300 employees at 28
companies across North America, his team found that businesses with
the best product development track records do three things better
than their less successful peers.</p>

<ul>
<li>Create a clear sense of projects goals early on;</li>

<li>Nurture a strong project culture;</li>

<li>Maintain close contact with customers throughout a project's
duration.</li>
</ul>

<p>Of the three, what does your organization do best? I'm presently
working with one web development company that has goals one and two
nailed, but fell short recently on the third. It made a difference
- we missed a client deliverable. I made two phone calls to make
sure it didn't happen, but my primary contact person had taken a
long weekend, with no message left for me and nothing to show my
client. Trust blown.</p>

<p>How do you communicate with your folks when you know you'll be
out of the office? You're entitled to vacation. How do you let your
clients know you're still responsible for the project they've
entrusted to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Hard and Soft Skills</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/21/hard-and-soft-skills</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 09:51:09 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/21/hard-and-soft-skills</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>I'm struck by how smart Jonathan Feldman is when he identifies
that the best PPM leaders have a balance of hard and soft skills.
Let's face it - we often hire the sharpest, smartest engineers, and
communication isn't necessarily in their skill set. It might never
have had to be.</p>

<p>Here's what Feldman says: "Think of it as a balance of soft
skills and technical acumen....These people are rare, but to be
successful with PPM, you must find them, either inside or outside
your organization, and put them to work. Don't limit yourself to
IT. Are there savvy people in line departments who have an interest
in solving the problem?"</p>

<p>That sentence is clear. You want "savvy" PPMs&nbsp;- people who
can read people, empathize with them,&nbsp;help them get the job
done, and then get out of the way. At the root of this skill is not
smarts or business&nbsp;sense or anything remotely alpha dog&nbsp;-
it's about&nbsp;- dare I say it&nbsp;- &nbsp;love.</p>

<p>Second, you want people who want to solve the problem. Easy to
say, not&nbsp;so easy to find. How many meetings revolve around
everyone's take on an issue? Does this solve the problem, or
merely&nbsp;keep it&nbsp;alive? We all need to know when our point
of view is less important than just getting the job done. And this,
when it comes down to it, is about letting go of self,&nbsp;and
rediscovering&nbsp;our essential humility, even when the stakes are
high.</p>

<p>--Marti @ the Summit</p>

<p>Fieldsman's article "Get Your Projects in Line" appears in the
March 8, 2010 issue of Information Week.</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Jonathan Feldman - "Get Your Projects in Line."</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/20/jonathan-feldman---get-your-projects-in-line</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 16:32:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/20/jonathan-feldman---get-your-projects-in-line</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>Information Week recently published a piece by Jonathan Feldman
called "Get Your Projects in Line." He's trying to save you money,
because "a practical PPM implementation, sized correctly for your
organization, can boost IT's credibility and effectiveness." I like
his proactive approach:</p>

<ol>
<li>Decide on what problem you're solving and how to know when
you've solved it.</li>

<li>Fit your PPM governance to either a grassroots or top-down
approach.</li>

<li>Implement a governance framework, but keep your
perspective.</li>

<li>Match the implementer to the initiative.</li>

<li>Get real about work capacity and financial management.</li>

<li>Pick your budget and battles.</li>

<li>It's not about the tool, but it's important to define a
toolset.</li>

<li>Don't get hung up on automated integration.</li>

<li>Educate, close the loop, and begin again.</li>
</ol>

<p>Points too good to gloss over. We'll tease these out in future
posts.</p>

<p>-- Marti @ the Summit</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Project Chicken</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/18/project-chicken</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 10:31:29 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/18/project-chicken</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>Thanks again to <a href="/conference-speakers/david-maxfield"
title="David Maxfield">David Maxfield</a> for helping us understand
what's going on when everybody knows a project is broken, but
nobody speaks up. Maxfield calls this phenomenon "project
chicken."</p>

<p>When project participants play project chicken, the status and
review process becomes a joke. In numerical terms,&nbsp;here's what
that means:</p>

<ul>
<li>78% of projects exceed budget</li>

<li>86% miss deadlines</li>

<li>74% have missing or wrong functionality or quality
problems</li>

<li>Team morale is damaged on 54% of projects</li>

<li>23% have a long list of problems to be resolved after the
project ends.</li>
</ul>

<p>Tired of playing project chicken? <a href="/conference-registration"
title="Conference Registration">Come to RPS 2010</a> in La
Jolla.</p>

<p>--Marti @ the Summit</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>AWOL Sponsors</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/17/awol-sponsors</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 12:23:36 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/17/awol-sponsors</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>Many thanks to <a href="/conference-speakers/david-maxfield"
title="David Maxfield">David Maxfield</a> and <a
href="http://www.vitalsmarts.com" target="_blank"
title="Vital Smarts">Vital Smarts</a> for providing us with these
insights on AWOL sponsors. An AWOL sponsor doesn't provide
leadership, political clout, time, or energy to see a project
through to completion. David will be a speaker at&nbsp;the&nbsp;<a
href="/conference-registration" title="Conference Registration">2010
Resource Planning Summit</a>.</p>

<p>Key findings include:</p>

<ul>
<li>65 percent of project leaders experience problems with AWOL
sponsors.</li>

<li>About half of those make some attempt to bring up their
concerns.</li>

<li>88 percent indicate that conversations on this subject are
difficult if not impossible to have in their organizations.</li>

<li>Fewer than one in five project leaders who suffer from AWOL
sponsors are able to hold the crucial conversation in a way that
solves the problem.</li>
</ul>

<p>When the project leader fails to resolve AWOL sponsor problems,
projects are destined the fail.</p>

<p>Resonate with you?&nbsp;Sure did with me.</p>

<p>--Marti @ the&nbsp;Summit</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>iPad Drawing Announced for RPS 2010</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/12/ipad-drawing-announced-for-rps-2010</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 10:04:49 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/12/ipad-drawing-announced-for-rps-2010</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>If you haven't heard, I'll fill you in. <a
href="/conference-registration" title="Conference Registration">Early
registrants</a> (between now and June 15) for the 2010 Resource
Planning Summit will be entered into a drawing for the chance to
win one of three Apple iPads.</p>

<p>Here's the best review I've read so far: <a
href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/03/apple-ipad-review/"
target="_blank"
title="iPad Review">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/03/apple-ipad-review/</a></p>

<p>Props to Joshua Topolsky for helpful insights like these:</p>

<ul>
<li>The iPad is all about its screen, and Apple's 9.7-inch LED
backlit IPS display does not disappoint;</li>

<li>As far as actual navigation on the device goes, it really is
exactly like the iPhone;</li>

<li>We'd like to point out that we haven't mentioned files,
folders, or windows. That's because there's no such thing in the
universe of the iPad;</li>

<li>The iPad browser doesn't support Flash, and won't support
Flash, perhaps ever.</li>
</ul>

<p>Check out the complete review, which is rich with detail and
features terrific photographs. Whether you like Apple or not,
you've probably been curious about the iPad. So <a
href="/conference-registration"
title="Conference Registration">register early</a>, and come away a
winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>How to Annoy Your Boss</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/12/how-to-annoy-your-boss</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/5/12/how-to-annoy-your-boss</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>I'm charmed by Jurgen Appelo, a "writer, speaker, developer,
entrepreneur, manager, blogger, reader, dreamer, leader,
freethinker, and… Dutch guy." Jurgen lives at <a
href="http://www.noop.nl/"
target="_blank">http://www.noop.nl/</a></p>

<ol>
<li>When you send an email message to your manager, make the number
of people in the cc proportional to the number of complaints in
that message. If it's really serious, send the cc to the whole
organization.</li>

<li>To any urgent verbal request from your manager, reply that you
will be working on it straight away. Then ignore it. Repeat this
procedure until your manager starts turning blue, then send your
manager a hyperlink to some web page about "servant
leadership."</li>

<li>Select any two arbitrary departments and complain that there's
too little communication between them. One hour later, complain
about time wasted in too many meetings.</li>

<li>Tell your manager that you can never find the time to work on
<a href="/conference-speakers"
title="Conference Speakers">self-development</a>, because of the
sheer size of your workload. Then one hour later, book a lengthy
vacation.</li>
</ol>

<p>**(On point #4...RPS 2010 delivers on <a
href="/conference-speakers"
title="Conference Speakers">self-development speakers</a>, and San
Diego is sure nice for vaca :)</p>

<p>- Marti@theSummit</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Thriving on Stress</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/4/30/thriving-on-stress</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:56:56 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/4/30/thriving-on-stress</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>I wish I could have gone to last year's <a
href="/conference-agenda" title="Conference Agenda">Resource
Planning Summit</a>, even if just to hear <a
href="/conference-speakers" title="Conference Speakers">Art
Mortell</a>. He is a well-known motivational speaker in technology
circles. and he had suggestions not for just surviving stress, but
thriving on it. Replace your negative addictions with positive
ones, such as:</p>

<ul>
<li>Exercise (especially aerobic)</li>

<li>Work</li>

<li>Relationships</li>

<li>Solitude (mediation, spiritual solitude, personal
solitude)</li>
</ul>

<p>If you drop a negative addiction, try to replace it with a
positive one. This will lessen the anxiety of dropping the negative
addiction. Happiness, he adds, is "modifying our expectations to
keep ourselves in balance."</p>

<p>Are you a perfectionist? Or do you keep things in
perspective?</p>

<p>--Marti @ the Summit</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Attendee Comments on 2009 RPS Summit</title><link>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/4/28/attendee-comments-on-2009-rps-summit</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:29:33 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.resourceplanningsummit.com/rps-blog/2010/4/28/attendee-comments-on-2009-rps-summit</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>Here's a neat, short video that shows <a
href="/attendee-comments" title="Attendee Comments">attendees
sharing feedback</a> on the 2009 Resource Planning Summit.&nbsp; I
was impressed with what these conference attendees had to say.
Usually I am not interested in what conference attendees going have
to say. I figure they were bribed with ice cream or something
stronger. But there was something about their thoughtfulness that
humbled me. There's no fancy footage here, but these folks are
sincere, and I was genuinely, stupidly moved. I heard how resource
planning can revolutionize the entire product development life
cycle, not to mention project management.<br />
<br />
 Apparently everybody -- that's right, everybody -- who attended
last year's Resource Planning Summit said they would come back.
That doesn't happen at most conferences. At least not the ones I've
been attending</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>
